| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
26.46k
21.2k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
25k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.24k
11.44k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
24.22k (x2.68)
TOTAL
69.38k
81.87k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
105.02k
145.13k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
108.51k
198.36k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.5k
85.67k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.04k
5.79k (x0.48)
TOTAL
262.07k
434.96k (x1.66)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3875 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
9359 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6299 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5626 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2439 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2154 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
16518 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4