| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.77k
3.8k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
17.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
5.17k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
3.16k (x0.38)
TOTAL
38.66k
29.52k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
15.28k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
76.62k
76.44k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.56k
27.48k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.5k
3.02k (x0.67)
TOTAL
132.53k
122.2k (x0.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
13.95k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
20.7k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
5.33k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
3.03k (x0.31)
TOTAL
56.64k
43.01k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
58.56k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
92.95k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
28.55k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
2.98k (x0.45)
TOTAL
141.4k
183.04k (x1.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.2k
13.04k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
22.35k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.05k
5.37k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.53k
3.4k (x0.36)
TOTAL
59.23k
44.15k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
43.69k
56.49k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
70.25k
100.74k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
28.21k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.24k
3.04k (x0.49)
TOTAL
148.66k
188.49k (x1.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.46k
14.2k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
23.23k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.24k
5.35k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
5.18k (x0.57)
TOTAL
69.38k
47.96k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
105.02k
58.24k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
108.51k
105.72k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.5k
28.73k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.04k
5.59k (x0.46)
TOTAL
262.07k
198.27k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3875 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
9359 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6299 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5626 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2439 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2154 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16518 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4