Core i5-1135G7 vs FX 8350
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 148.7 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 148.7 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
600f20
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
15.2k
9.85k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
8.41k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.05k
3.58k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.53k
6.32k (x0.66)
TOTAL
59.23k
28.16k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
43.69k
44.93k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
70.25k
45.21k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
22.81k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.24k
5.19k (x0.83)
TOTAL
148.66k
118.14k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1560 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2509 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1017 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
223 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
5309 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3618 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5585 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2631 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2268 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
14103 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4