| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i9-12900KF


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 5.1 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
90672
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/24
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
28.96k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
30k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
16.94k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
17.14k (x1.82)
TOTAL
58.83k
93.05k (x1.58)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
166.25k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
172.03k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
96.95k (x3.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
55.78k (x7.79)
TOTAL
157.08k
491.01k (x3.13)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
57.05k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
29.66k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
16.48k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
17.78k (x2.04)
TOTAL
68.08k
120.97k (x1.78)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
546.04k (x5.78)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
437.01k (x4.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
211.36k (x6.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
24.92k (x2.38)
TOTAL
237.55k
1219.33k (x5.13)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4