| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.9 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ec
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
545.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
33.62k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
30.02k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
7.17k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
15.43k (x3.05)
TOTAL
63.64k
86.24k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-11300H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
248.93k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
224.43k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
53.39k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
18.54k (x3.09)
TOTAL
285.75k
545.3k (x1.91)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4