Core i5-11300H vs i7-4790K
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
306c3
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
52.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
215.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
26.16k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
14.78k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
6.01k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
5.52k (x1.09)
TOTAL
63.64k
52.47k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-11300H
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
107.76k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
70.84k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
27.99k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
8.87k (x1.48)
TOTAL
285.75k
215.47k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
1225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
805 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
318 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
2448 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
5946 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
3359 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
11925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4