| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs i7-4500U


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4.3 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
40651
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2021
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
66.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
16.67k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
9k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
3.75k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
3.6k (x0.71)
TOTAL
63.64k
33.02k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-11300H

i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
31.77k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
21.36k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
7.95k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
5.06k (x0.84)
TOTAL
285.75k
66.14k (x0.23)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
4410 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4