| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs i5-9500T


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
274.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
24.5k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
21.41k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
4.82k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
10.73k (x2.12)
TOTAL
63.64k
61.46k (x0.97)

Multithread

i5-11300H

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
134.63k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
113.61k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
21.71k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
4.07k (x0.68)
TOTAL
285.75k
274.02k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4