Core i5-11300H vs i5-4210U
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
40651
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
57.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
13.79k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
7.79k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
3.11k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
2.72k (x0.54)
TOTAL
63.64k
27.41k (x0.43)
Multithread
i5-11300H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
28.78k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
18.99k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
7.21k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
2.6k (x0.43)
TOTAL
285.75k
57.58k (x0.2)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
3839 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4