| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
706e5
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
21.5k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
17.71k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
7.92k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
8.24k (x1.63)
TOTAL
63.64k
55.37k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-11300H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
73.03k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
68.19k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
24.89k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
5.54k (x0.92)
TOTAL
285.75k
171.65k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4