Core i5-11300H vs i5-10300H
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0652
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
27.14k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
24.75k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
5.73k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
11.84k (x2.34)
TOTAL
63.64k
69.47k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-11300H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
105.77k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
107.47k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
24.82k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
8.02k (x1.34)
TOTAL
285.75k
246.07k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4