| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs i3-9100T


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.5 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906eb
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
192.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
24.89k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
21.82k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
4.83k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
8.63k (x1.71)
TOTAL
63.64k
60.16k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-11300H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
89.4k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
81.19k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
18.06k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
4.24k (x0.71)
TOTAL
285.75k
192.88k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4