Core i5-11300H vs i3-6006U
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
406e3
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2021
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
68.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
12.89k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
11.72k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
2.74k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
3.95k (x0.78)
TOTAL
63.64k
31.3k (x0.49)
Multithread
i5-11300H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
29.95k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
27.93k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
6.74k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
3.77k (x0.63)
TOTAL
285.75k
68.38k (x0.24)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
1997 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
1862 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
449 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
251 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
4559 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
6444 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1371 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1975 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
15649 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4