| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs Ryzen 9 4900HS


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2021
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
360.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
14.87k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
21.53k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
8.39k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
8.21k (x1.62)
TOTAL
63.64k
53k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-11300H

4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
124.63k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
158.62k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
69.79k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
7.53k (x1.26)
TOTAL
285.75k
360.57k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
10302 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4