Core i5-11300H vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
16.85k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
26.03k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
9.54k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
22.55k (x4.46)
TOTAL
63.64k
74.97k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-11300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
229.41k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
292.81k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
128.48k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
36.8k (x6.13)
TOTAL
285.75k
687.5k (x2.41)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4