| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
15.5k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
22.96k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
8.78k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
8.5k (x1.68)
TOTAL
63.64k
55.74k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-11300H

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
110.78k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
149.38k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
60.88k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
6.68k (x1.11)
TOTAL
285.75k
327.72k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4