Core i5-11300H vs Ryzen 5 5600G
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
22.16k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
24.46k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
10.71k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
22.44k (x4.44)
TOTAL
63.64k
79.76k (x1.25)
Multithread
i5-11300H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
112.5k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
153.92k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
67.75k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
11.47k (x1.91)
TOTAL
285.75k
345.64k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4