| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs i7-1280P


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906a3
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/20
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
468.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
39.78k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
26.06k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
12.44k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
13.17k (x2.6)
TOTAL
63.64k
91.45k (x1.44)

Multithread

i5-11300H

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
209.96k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
170.21k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
72.04k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
16.09k (x2.68)
TOTAL
285.75k
468.3k (x1.64)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4