Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
206c2
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
8.35k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
5.58k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
3.32k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
3k (x0.37)
TOTAL
53.19k
20.26k (x0.38)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
49.72k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
35.19k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
21.88k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
8.6k (x1.49)
TOTAL
101.38k
115.4k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4