| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon W3550


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
106a5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Bloomfield
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
28 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
73.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
2.3k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
5.21k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
3.31k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.09k (x0.38)
TOTAL
38.97k
13.92k (x0.36)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
8.75k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
19.8k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
12.38k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
6.17k (x1.06)
TOTAL
69.62k
47.09k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
8.34k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
5.56k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
3.26k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
3.08k (x0.38)
TOTAL
53.19k
20.24k (x0.38)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
32.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
21.59k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
12.85k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
6.27k (x1.09)
TOTAL
101.38k
73.21k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4