Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
106a5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
28 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
7.35k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
4.89k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
2.9k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2.82k (x0.34)
TOTAL
53.19k
17.96k (x0.34)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
29.69k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
22.26k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
14.91k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
6.29k (x1.09)
TOTAL
101.38k
73.16k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4