| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E5472


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.1 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
10676
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
September 2020
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
2.29k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
5.85k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
2.44k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.81k (x0.59)
TOTAL
38.97k
15.39k (x0.39)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
9.06k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
23.09k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
9.7k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
2.53k (x0.43)
TOTAL
69.62k
44.38k (x0.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
2.88k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
6.36k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
2.55k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
4.83k (x0.59)
TOTAL
53.19k
16.62k (x0.31)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
11.19k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
24.85k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
10.04k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
2.54k (x0.44)
TOTAL
101.38k
48.62k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4