| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.1 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
1067a
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.833 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
12288 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2008
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
17.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
48.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
2.6k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
6.67k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
2.72k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.43k (x0.54)
TOTAL
38.97k
16.42k (x0.42)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
9.92k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
25.37k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
10.31k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
3.37k (x0.58)
TOTAL
69.62k
48.96k (x0.7)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
3.28k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
7.28k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
2.83k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
3.9k (x0.48)
TOTAL
53.19k
17.29k (x0.33)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
11.72k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
24.91k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
9.77k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
2.57k (x0.45)
TOTAL
101.38k
48.98k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
123 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
262 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
516 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4