Core i3-1115G4 vs i9-10980XE
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 9 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 9 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
18/36
TDP
28 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25344 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.52k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
17.94k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.5k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
9.64k (x1.17)
TOTAL
38.97k
37.6k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
84.93k (x9.24)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
409.55k (x11.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
122.88k (x6.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
22.12k (x3.8)
TOTAL
69.62k
639.48k (x9.18)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
16.03k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
23.95k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
6.03k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
9.37k (x1.15)
TOTAL
53.19k
55.38k (x1.04)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
316.11k (x10.43)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
503.75k (x11.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
131.82k (x6.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
22.24k (x3.85)
TOTAL
101.38k
973.92k (x9.61)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
16.4k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
20.97k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.82k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
8.86k (x1.1)
TOTAL
54.18k
52.05k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
316.84k (x9.86)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
461.09k (x10.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
129.82k (x6.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
22.09k (x3.94)
TOTAL
100.87k
929.85k (x9.22)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
29.53k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.59k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.99k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
10.22k (x1.41)
TOTAL
62.19k
68.33k (x1.1)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
587.06k (x10.32)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
496.41k (x8.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
134.66k (x6.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
22.99k (x3.78)
TOTAL
137.96k
1241.12k (x9)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4