| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-950


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
106a5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
76.29k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
8.01k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
5.38k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
3.11k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2.96k (x0.36)
TOTAL
53.19k
19.46k (x0.37)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
31.53k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
24.16k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
15.84k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
4.75k (x0.82)
TOTAL
101.38k
76.29k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
587 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4