| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-930


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-930 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the i7-930 gets 69.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
106a5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2010
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
17.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
69.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
1.94k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
4.38k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
2.64k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.41k (x0.29)
TOTAL
38.97k
11.37k (x0.29)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
7.3k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
19.36k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
13.43k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
2.01k (x0.35)
TOTAL
69.62k
42.11k (x0.6)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
7.28k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
4.82k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
2.86k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2.62k (x0.32)
TOTAL
53.19k
17.58k (x0.33)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
28.09k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
21.62k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
14.83k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
4.85k (x0.84)
TOTAL
101.38k
69.39k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
534 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
855 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
5732 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4