| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-7660U


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
132.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
22.46k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
19.29k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.77k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
10.94k (x1.51)
TOTAL
62.19k
57.46k (x0.92)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
56.67k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
46.95k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
12.36k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
16.84k (x2.77)
TOTAL
137.96k
132.81k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
8854 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4