| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-6560U


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
406e3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
107.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.29k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
13.52k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.24k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
7.08k (x0.86)
TOTAL
38.97k
28.14k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
6.49k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
31.11k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
10.25k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
6.16k (x1.06)
TOTAL
69.62k
54.01k (x0.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
22.21k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
19.25k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.41k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
7.09k (x0.98)
TOTAL
62.19k
52.96k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
44.94k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
44.98k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
10.83k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6.26k (x1.03)
TOTAL
137.96k
107.01k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4