| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-4702MQ


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
306c3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
28 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.45k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
8.53k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
3.99k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.51k (x0.43)
TOTAL
38.97k
19.47k (x0.5)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
11.93k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
42.4k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
18k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
3.6k (x0.62)
TOTAL
69.62k
75.92k (x1.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
18.98k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
9.5k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.32k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
3.99k (x0.55)
TOTAL
62.19k
36.8k (x0.59)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
74.75k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
47.72k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
19.65k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
3.02k (x0.5)
TOTAL
137.96k
145.15k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4