Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-1065G7
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
706e5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
214.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
28.19k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.13k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
10.32k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
14.17k (x1.96)
TOTAL
62.19k
74.82k (x1.2)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
86.39k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
86.22k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
32.99k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
8.75k (x1.44)
TOTAL
137.96k
214.34k (x1.55)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
14289 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4