| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-9500T


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.73k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
15.41k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.62k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
10.59k (x1.29)
TOTAL
38.97k
34.35k (x0.88)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
20.82k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
85.48k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
23.21k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
4.11k (x0.71)
TOTAL
69.62k
133.63k (x1.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
12.4k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
18.41k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
4.69k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
10.48k (x1.28)
TOTAL
53.19k
45.98k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
74.86k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
105.88k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
22.34k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
4.01k (x0.69)
TOTAL
101.38k
207.08k (x2.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
13.46k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
20.21k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
4.72k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
10.25k (x1.28)
TOTAL
54.18k
48.64k (x0.9)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
74.65k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
110.86k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
22.08k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.12k (x0.73)
TOTAL
100.87k
211.7k (x2.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
24.5k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
21.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.82k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
10.73k (x1.48)
TOTAL
62.19k
61.46k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
134.63k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
113.61k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
21.71k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
4.07k (x0.67)
TOTAL
137.96k
274.02k (x1.99)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4