Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-8265U
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
806eb
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
24.32k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
20.35k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.38k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
8.52k (x1.18)
TOTAL
62.19k
57.57k (x0.93)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
65.17k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
63.6k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
14.4k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6.31k (x1.04)
TOTAL
137.96k
149.48k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4