| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-5675R


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
40671
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.14k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
14.35k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.94k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.47k (x0.67)
TOTAL
38.97k
28.91k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
16.02k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
54.6k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
18.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
16.87k (x2.9)
TOTAL
69.62k
106.18k (x1.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
12.86k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
16.85k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
5.19k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
5.49k (x0.67)
TOTAL
53.19k
40.39k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
50.07k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
64.61k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
19.84k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
17.09k (x2.96)
TOTAL
101.38k
151.6k (x1.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
12.88k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
18.27k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.12k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.45k (x0.68)
TOTAL
54.18k
41.72k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
49.91k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
70.3k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
19.69k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
16.92k (x3.02)
TOTAL
100.87k
156.83k (x1.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
21.91k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
18.59k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.2k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
5.72k (x0.79)
TOTAL
62.19k
51.43k (x0.83)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
84.92k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
72.09k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
20.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
17.07k (x2.8)
TOTAL
137.96k
194.2k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4