| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.3k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
16.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.25k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
12.61k (x1.54)
TOTAL
38.97k
38.72k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
18.1k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
79.16k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
26.75k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
13.81k (x2.37)
TOTAL
69.62k
137.82k (x1.98)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
26.28k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
23.38k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.52k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
12.96k (x1.79)
TOTAL
62.19k
68.14k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
163.67k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
159.74k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
39k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
7.56k (x1.24)
TOTAL
137.96k
369.97k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4