| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-10300H


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0652
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
15.65k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
23.13k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.66k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
11.43k (x1.43)
TOTAL
54.18k
55.87k (x1.03)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
26.77k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
43.81k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
10.17k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
11.91k (x2.12)
TOTAL
100.87k
92.66k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
27.14k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
24.75k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.73k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
11.84k (x1.64)
TOTAL
62.19k
69.47k (x1.12)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
105.77k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
107.47k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
24.82k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
8.02k (x1.32)
TOTAL
137.96k
246.07k (x1.78)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4