| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i3-6100T


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
506e3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
105.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.14k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
12.26k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
3.94k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.21k (x0.27)
TOTAL
38.97k
21.55k (x0.55)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
6.52k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
30.61k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
10.59k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
2.77k (x0.48)
TOTAL
69.62k
50.49k (x0.73)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
10.46k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
17.55k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.71k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.07k (x0.38)
TOTAL
54.18k
34.79k (x0.64)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
23.92k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
42.11k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
10.51k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
2.57k (x0.46)
TOTAL
100.87k
79.1k (x0.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
19.58k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
16.97k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
3.91k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
3.47k (x0.48)
TOTAL
62.19k
43.92k (x0.71)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
47.02k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
44.41k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
9.93k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
3.85k (x0.63)
TOTAL
137.96k
105.21k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4