Core i3-1115G4 vs i3-6100
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
506e3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
28 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
112.28k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.81k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
15.65k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.14k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.28k (x0.52)
TOTAL
38.97k
28.89k (x0.74)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
7.75k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
37.33k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
12.13k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
3.56k (x0.61)
TOTAL
69.62k
60.77k (x0.87)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
13.76k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
19.96k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
5.44k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
4.4k (x0.54)
TOTAL
53.19k
43.55k (x0.82)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
28.99k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
45.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
12.72k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
3.68k (x0.64)
TOTAL
101.38k
91.14k (x0.9)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
13.78k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
21.21k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.2k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.73k (x0.47)
TOTAL
54.18k
43.92k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
29.02k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
49.55k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
12.3k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.28k (x0.58)
TOTAL
100.87k
94.15k (x0.93)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
22.89k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
21.04k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.9k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
4.01k (x0.55)
TOTAL
62.19k
52.84k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
50.05k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
47.13k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
11.38k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
3.72k (x0.61)
TOTAL
137.96k
112.28k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4