| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i3-10105


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.5k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
18.39k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.78k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.3k (x1.01)
TOTAL
38.97k
36.97k (x0.95)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
16.13k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
75.62k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
27.88k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
3.57k (x0.61)
TOTAL
69.62k
123.2k (x1.77)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
16.19k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
23.07k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
6.04k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
8.46k (x1.04)
TOTAL
53.19k
53.77k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
57.59k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
100.63k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
28.59k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
3.56k (x0.62)
TOTAL
101.38k
190.38k (x1.88)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
16.11k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
24.12k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.71k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
7.89k (x0.98)
TOTAL
54.18k
53.83k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
58.25k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
105.73k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
27.8k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.51k (x0.62)
TOTAL
100.87k
195.29k (x1.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
28.9k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
25.85k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.88k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
8.29k (x1.15)
TOTAL
62.19k
68.92k (x1.11)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
111.69k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
110.23k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
28.45k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
3.56k (x0.58)
TOTAL
137.96k
253.93k (x1.84)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4