Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 5.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 5.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.46k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
18.46k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
8.05k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
23.71k (x2.89)
TOTAL
38.97k
54.68k (x1.4)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
52.65k (x5.73)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
265.41k (x7.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
140.78k (x7.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
46.91k (x8.06)
TOTAL
69.62k
505.76k (x7.26)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
17.35k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
25.87k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
8.72k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
27.86k (x3.41)
TOTAL
53.19k
79.8k (x1.5)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
201.57k (x6.65)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
284.41k (x6.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
145.16k (x7.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
100.56k (x17.42)
TOTAL
101.38k
731.7k (x7.22)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
16.95k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
25.37k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
9.23k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
24.83k (x3.1)
TOTAL
54.18k
76.38k (x1.41)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
196.31k (x6.11)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
290.5k (x6.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
143.95k (x7.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
64.92k (x11.57)
TOTAL
100.87k
695.69k (x6.9)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
16.73k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
24.74k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
8.82k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
22.22k (x3.07)
TOTAL
62.19k
72.51k (x1.17)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
248.24k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
309.66k (x5.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
140.01k (x7.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
58.39k (x9.59)
TOTAL
137.96k
756.3k (x5.48)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4