| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.25k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
19.72k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.84k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
21.36k (x2.6)
TOTAL
38.97k
51.17k (x1.31)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
35.04k (x3.81)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
181.42k (x5.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
64.86k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
8.21k (x1.41)
TOTAL
69.62k
289.54k (x4.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
15.22k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
24.12k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
5.87k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
21k (x2.57)
TOTAL
53.19k
66.21k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
126.81k (x4.18)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
229.86k (x5.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
61.74k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
9.77k (x1.69)
TOTAL
101.38k
428.19k (x4.22)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
14.44k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
24.92k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.8k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
19.07k (x2.38)
TOTAL
54.18k
64.24k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
122.01k (x3.8)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
220.34k (x5.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
59.89k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
9.9k (x1.76)
TOTAL
100.87k
412.13k (x4.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
15.61k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
26.08k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.84k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
18.34k (x2.54)
TOTAL
62.19k
65.87k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
123.33k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
240.46k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
61.23k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
8.17k (x1.34)
TOTAL
137.96k
433.19k (x3.14)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4