| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 2.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
22.16k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
24.46k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
10.71k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
22.44k (x3.1)
TOTAL
62.19k
79.76k (x1.28)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
112.5k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
153.92k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
67.75k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
11.47k (x1.88)
TOTAL
137.96k
345.64k (x2.51)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4