Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.2k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
17.36k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
7.5k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
23.79k (x2.9)
TOTAL
38.97k
52.85k (x1.36)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
22.11k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
108.04k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
56.81k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
36.39k (x6.25)
TOTAL
69.62k
223.36k (x3.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
15.38k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
21.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
7.97k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
24.76k (x3.03)
TOTAL
53.19k
70.05k (x1.32)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
96.91k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
135.12k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
70.39k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
56.43k (x9.78)
TOTAL
101.38k
358.85k (x3.54)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
15.04k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
20.95k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
8.57k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
21.71k (x2.71)
TOTAL
54.18k
66.27k (x1.22)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
94.36k (x2.94)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
141.73k (x3.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
69.38k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
32.72k (x5.83)
TOTAL
100.87k
338.19k (x3.35)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
16.04k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
24.47k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
8.38k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
21.66k (x2.99)
TOTAL
62.19k
70.55k (x1.13)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
113.63k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
143.55k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
63.84k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
27.34k (x4.49)
TOTAL
137.96k
348.35k (x2.52)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4