| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f81
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
178.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.63k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
16.69k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.92k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5k (x0.61)
TOTAL
38.97k
30.24k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
13.62k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
65.71k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
23.7k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
5.64k (x0.97)
TOTAL
69.62k
108.67k (x1.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
13.51k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.34k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.98k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
4.24k (x0.59)
TOTAL
62.19k
45.07k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
52.21k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
95.66k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
25.54k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
4.85k (x0.8)
TOTAL
137.96k
178.26k (x1.29)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
5093 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4