| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
15.96k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.69k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
17.42k (x2.12)
TOTAL
38.97k
41.47k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
20.88k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
110.37k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
39.25k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
6.66k (x1.14)
TOTAL
69.62k
177.16k (x2.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
13.76k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
23.03k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.12k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
15.23k (x2.1)
TOTAL
62.19k
57.13k (x0.92)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
83.23k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
161.06k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
40.52k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6.73k (x1.1)
TOTAL
137.96k
291.53k (x2.11)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4