Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.8k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
17.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.17k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.16k (x0.39)
TOTAL
38.97k
29.52k (x0.76)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
15.28k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
76.44k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
27.48k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
3.02k (x0.52)
TOTAL
69.62k
122.2k (x1.76)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
13.95k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
20.7k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
5.33k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
3.03k (x0.37)
TOTAL
53.19k
43.01k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
58.56k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
92.95k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
28.55k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
2.98k (x0.52)
TOTAL
101.38k
183.04k (x1.81)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
13.04k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
22.35k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.37k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.4k (x0.42)
TOTAL
54.18k
44.15k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
56.49k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
100.74k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
28.21k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.04k (x0.54)
TOTAL
100.87k
188.49k (x1.87)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
14.2k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
23.23k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.35k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
5.18k (x0.72)
TOTAL
62.19k
47.96k (x0.77)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
58.24k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
105.72k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
28.73k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
5.59k (x0.92)
TOTAL
137.96k
198.27k (x1.44)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4