Core i3-1115G4 vs FX 8350
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 100.9 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 100.9 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
600f20
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Vishera
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
9.85k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
8.41k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.58k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
6.32k (x0.79)
TOTAL
54.18k
28.16k (x0.52)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
44.93k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
45.21k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
22.81k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.19k (x0.92)
TOTAL
100.87k
118.14k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1555 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
699 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
200 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
3602 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5262 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1956 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
13214 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4