Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-12400F
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.9 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.9 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
7.43k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
18.64k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
13.15k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
14.82k (x1.8)
TOTAL
38.97k
54.04k (x1.39)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
36.23k (x3.94)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
134.76k (x3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
84.06k (x4.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
16.71k (x2.87)
TOTAL
69.62k
271.76k (x3.9)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
24.18k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
23.85k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
14.42k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
14.87k (x1.82)
TOTAL
53.19k
77.32k (x1.45)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
122.98k (x4.06)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
168.77k (x3.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
96.11k (x4.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
16.32k (x2.83)
TOTAL
101.38k
404.19k (x3.99)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
24.24k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
24.74k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
13.95k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
14.47k (x1.8)
TOTAL
54.18k
77.41k (x1.43)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
126.87k (x3.95)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
186.48k (x4.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
92.37k (x4.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
15.45k (x2.75)
TOTAL
100.87k
421.18k (x4.18)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
33.85k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
20.33k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
10.51k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
11.77k (x1.63)
TOTAL
62.19k
76.46k (x1.23)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
174.21k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
141.31k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
64.86k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
19.01k (x3.12)
TOTAL
137.96k
399.39k (x2.89)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4