| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i3-12100T


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
6.88k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
17.36k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
12.26k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
13.49k (x1.64)
TOTAL
38.97k
49.98k (x1.28)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
22.03k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
84.16k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
46.49k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
8.96k (x1.54)
TOTAL
69.62k
161.65k (x2.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
22.39k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
22.29k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
13.37k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
13.72k (x1.68)
TOTAL
53.19k
71.76k (x1.35)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
76.69k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
104.06k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
53.2k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
8.86k (x1.54)
TOTAL
101.38k
242.81k (x2.39)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
22.25k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
23.16k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
13.09k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
13.21k (x1.65)
TOTAL
54.18k
71.7k (x1.32)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
77.43k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
109.08k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
52.45k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
8.75k (x1.56)
TOTAL
100.87k
247.71k (x2.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
43.24k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
23.76k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
12.67k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
13.88k (x1.92)
TOTAL
62.19k
93.54k (x1.5)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
150.28k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
126.29k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
45.32k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
8.73k (x1.43)
TOTAL
137.96k
330.62k (x2.4)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4