| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-11800H


Description
Both models i3-1115G4 and i7-11800H are based on Tiger Lake architecture.

It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 4.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806d1
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
607.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
33.02k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
26.55k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
11.72k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
17.06k (x2.36)
TOTAL
62.19k
88.34k (x1.42)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
260.97k (x4.59)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
248.94k (x4.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
86.55k (x4.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
10.91k (x1.79)
TOTAL
137.96k
607.38k (x4.4)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
13497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4