Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-11700F
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 3.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 3.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
32.55k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
26.95k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
10.76k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
19.32k (x2.67)
TOTAL
62.19k
89.58k (x1.44)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
232.06k (x4.08)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
203.56k (x3.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
72.89k (x3.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
3.81k (x0.63)
TOTAL
137.96k
512.32k (x3.71)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4